There are clearly significant social benefits to land-use planning, bu
t there may also be significant private and social costs which need to
be taken into account. In this paper we explore the relationship betw
een land-use planning, the supply of housing land, and the supply and
price of housing. It is based on two pieces of empirical research. In
the first study, an investigation was conducted of the extent to which
land supply, and particularly the operation of the planning system, h
ad affected house prices in Britain during the 1980s, and how far plan
ning had placed a constraint on land supply or simply reorganised that
supply. In the follow-up study a single planning area was looked at t
o examine the extent to which increased land allocations in one area c
an compensate for constraints on land supply in another. We conclude t
hat the planning system imposes significant costs, which include the e
xacerbation of price increases in periods of economic growth, but with
out being able to generate higher housing output during recession. In
addition the planning system tends to foster a narrower range of housi
ng types and densities than would be expected in its absence, and so r
estricts the choice available to consumers.