Lg. Barrettlennard et al., THE MIXED BLESSING OF ECHOLOCATION - DIFFERENCES IN SONAR USE BY FISH-EATING AND MAMMAL-EATING KILLER WHALES, Animal behaviour, 51, 1996, pp. 553-565
Despite well-documented experimental evidence of echolocation in tooth
ed whales, virtually nothing is known about the use and functional sig
nificance of cetacean sonar in the wild. Here, the patterns of echoloc
ation sounds produced by killer whales, Orcinus orca, off British Colu
mbia and Alaska are described. Two sympatric populations with divergen
t food habits differed markedly in sonar sound production. Individuals
belonging to the fish-eating 'resident' population produced trains of
characteristic sonar clicks, on average, 4% of the time, 27 times mor
e often than marine mammal-eating 'transient' killer whales. The click
trains of residents averaged 7 s, more than twice as long as the trai
ns of transients. Click repetition rates within resident's trains were
constant or changed gradually; within transient's trains they often f
luctuated abruptly. Transients produced isolated single or paired clic
ks at an average rate of 12/h, four times as often as residents. In ge
neral, the isolated clicks and infrequent, short and irregular trains
of transients were less conspicuous against background noise than the
sonar of residents. This difference in acoustic crypticity may reflect
a flexible response to the probability of alerting prey, because mari
ne mammals have more acute hearing than fish in the frequency range of
sonar clicks. In both populations, echolocation use per individual de
creased with increasing group size, suggesting the sharing of informat
ion between group members. No relationships were found between echoloc
ation activity and water clarity for whales of either population. Tran
sient whales often travelled or foraged without discernibly echolocati
ng, suggesting that passive listening provides cues for prey detection
and orientation. (C) 1996 The Association for the Study of Animal Beh
aviour.