Wlp. Vanduijnhoven et al., LARGE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RESULTS FROM DIFFERENT ASSAYS DURING LONGITUDINAL FOLLOW-UP OF A PROSTATE-CANCER PATIENT, Clinical chemistry, 42(4), 1996, pp. 637-641
A case is presented of a patient with stage D prostatic carcinoma, fro
m whom a serum sample proved to be an outlier in a correlation study p
erformed with a 2nd-generation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay o
n the Immulite system (6.4 mu g/L) and IMx (101 mu g/L). Clearly, the
PSA result reported by Immulite was falsely low. For nine longitudinal
samples, Immulite results were similar to 20-fold lower than the IMx
value (range of IMx results 5-275 mu g/L). A selection of the samples
was analyzed with the ACS:180, ES-600, and IMx (all >180 mu g/L); Immu
lite, DPC Coat-A-Count IRMA, Immune 1, AIA-pack, and Tandem-R (all <70
mu g/L); and Immulite free PSA assay (41 mu g/L). Gel filtration demo
nstrated that apart from the alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin (ACT) complex,
no other complexes were found. However, the sample consisted of 53% fr
ee PSA (IMx). Possibly, a change of conformation of the PSA molecule r
esulted in a decreased binding to ACT and a reduced affinity of the an
tibodies used in the affected assays.