DOES PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT WITH FELODIPINE, A CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST, PREVENT LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-INDUCED RENAL DYSFUNCTION IN HYDRATED DIABETIC AND NONDIABETIC PATIENTS WITH NORMAL OR MODERATELY REDUCED RENAL-FUNCTION
B. Spangbergviklund et al., DOES PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT WITH FELODIPINE, A CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST, PREVENT LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-INDUCED RENAL DYSFUNCTION IN HYDRATED DIABETIC AND NONDIABETIC PATIENTS WITH NORMAL OR MODERATELY REDUCED RENAL-FUNCTION, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 30(1), 1996, pp. 63-68
Twenty-seven patients (15 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics) with normal
to moderately reduced renal function underwent femoral angiography wit
h a low-osmolar contrast agent, iohexol (Omnipaque(R)), under perexami
natory hydration. Fourteen patients were randomised to pretreatment wi
th oral felodipine extended release (Plendil(R)) 10 mg and 13 patients
to placebo 3-4 h before angiography. GFR measured with [Cr-51] EDTA-c
learance decreased 24 hours after the angiography in the felodipine gr
oup from GFR 52.5 +/- 18.6 (mean +/- SD) to 46.2 +/- 16.5 ml/min (p <
0.01) and in the placebo group from 70.6 +/- 18.6 to 62.6 +/- 26.4 ml/
min (p < 0.01). Serum creatinine increased significantly in the felodi
pine group from 128 +/- 61 to 139 +/- 67 mu mol/l (p < 0.05) but not i
n the placebo group (122 +/- 54 to 125 +/- 51 mu mol/l (ns)). The valu
es of serum creatinine returned to baseline levels 7 days after angiog
raphy. During hydration there was only a slight reduction of GFR after
angiography with iohexol. Thus, felodipine had no major effect on GFR
after iohexol but, as baseline GFR tended to be lower in the felodipi
ne pre-treated patients, it might have had some renoprotective effect
in patients with more advanced renal failure.