T. Weiser et M. Wienrich, INVESTIGATIONS ON THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF THE ANTIPROLIFERANT AND ION-CHANNEL ANTAGONIST FLUFENAMIC ACID, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 353(4), 1996, pp. 452-460
The compound flufenamic acid has been previously described as an inhib
itor of chloride- and nonselective cation channels. Moreover, this com
pound showed antiproliferative effects in the mouse fibroblast cell li
ne LM(TK-). In this study, we investigated the effects of this compoun
d on cell proliferation and membrane currents induced by mitogens (suc
h as fetal calf serum, FCS) or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) i
n LM(TK-) cells. After a brief application of FCS or PDGF (5-15 s), th
e electrical response of the cells was biphasic: First, a transient po
tassium conductance was activated, which appeared 8.3 +/- 0.7 s after
the onset of stimulation and lasted for 30.1 +/- 2.9 s. The correspond
ing single channel currents in cell-attached patches had an amplitude
of 3-4 pA (at a holding potential of + 60 mV). The second effect of se
rum or PDGF was the occurrence of a cation conductance for monovalent
ions (sodium, potassium and cesium) and calcium. In contrast to the po
tassium current, this conductance activated later (11.8 +/- 1.6 s afte
r onset of fetal calf serum stimulation) and remained activated for mi
nutes. Flufenamic acid inhibited the proliferation of LM(TK-) cells re
versibly and in a concentration-dependent manner. This effect can be c
orrelated with the inhibitory effects of flufenamic acid on mitogen-in
duced membrane currents: The compound inhibited the non-selective cati
on current with an IC50 of 38 mu M, whereas 135 mu M were necessary fo
r halfmaximal inhibition of the potassium current; this is very close
to the concentration for halfmaximal inhibition of cell proliferation
(120 mu M). Hence, on the grounds of this comparison the blockade of t
he non-selective cation current appears to be of only minor importance
for the blockade of cell proliferation.