Gv. Janku et al., PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN ORTHOPEDICS IN THE UNITED-STATES, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (325), 1996, pp. 313-321
The use of different types of antithrombotic prophylactics in various
clinical settings was examined, A standardized questionnaire was maile
d to 5000 randomly selected practicing orthopaedic surgeons that detai
led practice profile, surgical case type and frequency, method of thro
mboembolism prophylaxis used, incidence of morbidity, and type of scre
ening used. Twenty-one percent (n = 1046) of surgeons surveyed returne
d the questionnaire, Four of 5 surgeons performing elective hip arthro
plasty used some form of thromboembolic prophylaxis for all of their p
atients, 13% used prophylaxis only for patients considered to be at hi
gh risk, and 3% of respondents never used prophylaxis. The rates of pr
ophylactic use for patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty were
similar, A considerably lower rate of routine prophylactic use was se
en among surgeons performing surgery for pelvic and lower extremity tr
auma, Except for cases involving neurologic compromise, most patients
undergoing either elective or traumatic spinal surgery were not given
prophylaxis, Low dose warfarin alone was the most commonly used prophy
laxis modality, A comparison of the results of the current survey with
those of past surveys showed that the use of aspirin has fallen, The
use of routine pharmacologic prophylaxis against thromboembolism in hi
p and knee arthroplasty has become the standard of care in the United
States, Among patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture and other l
ower extremity trauma, however, prophylaxis remains underused.