VARIATION IN MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND ACTIVITY IN 4 DIFFERENT WETLAND TYPES

Citation
Pm. Groffman et al., VARIATION IN MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND ACTIVITY IN 4 DIFFERENT WETLAND TYPES, Soil Science Society of America journal, 60(2), 1996, pp. 622-629
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
03615995
Volume
60
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
622 - 629
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-5995(1996)60:2<622:VIMBAA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Functional evaluation of wetlands in nutrient cycling, water quality m aintenance, and wetland construction and restoration contexts requires knowledge of differences in microbial processes between different wet land types and understanding of the nature and extent of variation in these processes within a given wetland type. In this study, we measure d a suite of microbial variables (microbial biomass C and N content, d enitrification enzyme activity, potential net N mineralization and nit rification, and soil respiration) that are indices of wetland nutrient cycling and water quality maintenance functions in four different wet land types (calcareous fens, red maple swamps, woodland pools, and wet clay meadows) in eastern New York state. Total soil C and N content, water content, pH, water-table levels, and groundwater NH4+, NO3-, and electrical conductivity were also measured. The clay meadow wetlands were drier and had lower levels of organic matter and most microbial v ariables than the other wetland types. Site-to-site variation within t he fens was very high and was not strongly controlled by water-table l evels. Organic matter content and N status appear to be strong regulat ors of microbial biomass and activity in fens. Red maple swamps and wo odland pools had similar levels of most microbial variables. Variation within these wetland types was controlled by hydrology and organic ma tter quality. The suite of microbial variables that we measured Identi fied potential functional differences between wetland types and should be useful for comparisons of the water quality maintenance value of d ifferent wetlands and for functional evaluation of altered or restored sites.