STEREOSELECTIVE HYDROLYSIS OF XENOBIOTIC ESTERS BY DIFFERENT CELL-LINES FROM RAT-LIVER AND HEPATOMA AND ITS APPLICATION TO CHIRAL PRODRUGS FOR DESIGNATED GROWTH SUPPRESSION OF CANCER-CELLS
Yi. Kageyama et al., STEREOSELECTIVE HYDROLYSIS OF XENOBIOTIC ESTERS BY DIFFERENT CELL-LINES FROM RAT-LIVER AND HEPATOMA AND ITS APPLICATION TO CHIRAL PRODRUGS FOR DESIGNATED GROWTH SUPPRESSION OF CANCER-CELLS, Chirality, 7(4), 1995, pp. 297-304
Stereoselectivity in the hydrolysis of racemic ethyl 2-phenylacetate d
erivatives by cultured cells of noncancerous cell lines from rat liver
(BRL, BRL 3A, Clone 9, and ARLJ301-3), spontaneously or oncogene tran
sformed rat liver cell lines (ARLJ301-3TR1, Anr4, Anr9-1, and Anr13-1)
, and cancer cell lines from rat hepatoma (H4-II-E, McA-RH7777, and MH
(1)C(1)) and sarcoma (XC) was studied. A strong (R)-enantiomer prefere
nce was found in the hydrolysis of ethyl 2-hydroxy- (2c) and 2-methoxy
-2-phenylacetate (3c) by the noncancerous and oncogene-transformed cel
ls and an (S)-enantiomer preference for ethyl N-acylphenylalaninates w
ith all the present cell lines. These inclinations were, however, not
recognized with ethyl 2-methoxy-2-phenylpropanoate and ethyl N-difluor
oacetyl or N-trifluoroacetylphenylalaninate. Moreover, the R preferenc
e for 3c was reversed in the reaction by hepatoma cells. Thus, the ste
reoselectivity is influenced by both structure of acyl group and speci
es of cell lines. The hepatoma cells were considerably different from
the noncancerous or oncogene-transformed cells in stereoselectivity. T
his fact was consistent with the order of colony formation in soft aga
r cultures (index of malignancy) and the resemblance in actively stain
ed esterase patterns in gel electrophoresis. The stereoselective hydro
lysis leads to cell-specific activation of anticancer prodrugs. This h
as been confirmed for the first time by the stereoselectivity of Anr4
and H4-II-E cells in the hydrolysis of a chiral mustard ester, bis(2-c
hloroethyl)aminophenyl 2-methoxy-2-phenylacetate (14) and by the diffe
rence of IC50 values of (R)- and (S)-14 against the two cell lines. (C
) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.