Cz. Mooney, BOOTSTRAP STATISTICAL-INFERENCE - EXAMPLES AND EVALUATIONS FOR POLITICAL-SCIENCE, American journal of political science, 40(2), 1996, pp. 570-602
Theory: Bootstrapping is a nonparametric approach to statistical infer
ence that relies on large amounts of computation rather than mathemati
cal analysis and distributional assumptions of traditional parametric
inference. It has been shown to provide asymptotically accurate infere
nces for a wide variety of statistics. Hypothesis: Bootstrapping may m
ake more accurate inferences than the parametric approach under two ge
neral circumstances: 1) when the assumptions of parametric inference a
re not tenable, and 2) when no parametric alternative exists for a pro
blem. Methods: Monte Carlo simulation is used to test the performance
of bootstrap and parametric confidence intervals for both types of sit
uations in which bootstrapping is hypothesized to be superior to param
etric inference. A single data example is used to illustrate the use o
f the bootstrap: a seats/votes model of U.S. House elections from 1932
to 1988. Results: My central conclusions are that in the cases examin
ed: 1) bootstrap confidence intervals are at least as good as the para
metric confidence interval and sometimes better, 2) OLS parametric con
fidence intervals do not perform too badly when the model error is non
-normal, especially as sample size increases, and 3) when no parametri
c alternative exists, the bootstrap provides a reasonable method of ma
king statistical inferences.