S. Paolucci et al., FACILITATORY EFFECT OF NEGLECT REHABILITATION ON THE RECOVERY OF LEFTHEMIPLEGIC STROKE PATIENTS - A CROSS-OVER STUDY, Journal of neurology, 243(4), 1996, pp. 308-314
A study of the effect of specific training for visual neglect on the r
ecovery of motor and functional impairment in stroke patients is repor
ted. Two groups of right hemisphere stroke patients with hemispatial n
eglect and one group without neglect were assessed by means of three f
unctional and neurological scales (Rivermead Mobility Index, Barthel I
ndex, Canadian Neurological Scale). Three evaluations were made at 0,
2 and 4 months from the beginning of physical rehabilitation. During t
he first 2 months of physical rehabilitation one of the two groups of
neglect patients was randomly assigned to specific training for neglec
t, and the second group to a general cognitive intervention; during th
e final 2 months of rehabilitation the types of training were switched
in the two groups. The non-neglect patients improved steadily during
physical rehabilitation. In contrast, the functional recovery of the t
wo neglect groups was time-locked to the period of the specific traini
ng for neglect. At the time of admission, the two neglect groups perfo
rmed at the same level; after 2 months of rehabilitation, the group wi
th neglect training showed higher functional recovery than the group w
ith only general cognitive intervention. When the latter group receive
d neglect training, there was no longer any difference between the two
neglect groups. This pattern was present for both of the functional s
cales used but not for the neurological scale. Motor and functional re
covery of stroke patients with neglect seems to be significantly impro
ved by the simultaneous presence of a treatment specifically focused o
n neglect.