OBJECTIVE DETECTION OF HEMIFIELD AND QUADRANTIC FIELD DEFECTS BY VISUAL-EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIALS

Citation
Ms. Bradnam et al., OBJECTIVE DETECTION OF HEMIFIELD AND QUADRANTIC FIELD DEFECTS BY VISUAL-EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIALS, British journal of ophthalmology, 80(4), 1996, pp. 297-303
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
ISSN journal
00071161
Volume
80
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
297 - 303
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1161(1996)80:4<297:ODOHAQ>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Aims/Background-An objective method for detecting hemifield and quadra ntic visual field defects has been developed using steady state visual evoked cortical potentials (VECPs), an adaptive noise canceller (ANC) , and Hotelling's t(2) statistic. The purpose of this study was to det ermine the sensitivity and specificity of the technique. Methods-Nine subjects (mean age 44 years) were investigated with field loss due to a variety of causes including both anterior and posterior visual pathw ay lesions. Dynamic perimetry was performed by means of a Goldmann or Tubingen perimeter. VECP recordings were made from each visual field q uadrant (23 degrees X23 degrees) by means of a steady state reversing checkerboard (7 . 7 rev/s). The central 5 degrees of the visual field and the vertical and horizontal meridians were masked during these mea surements. Recordings were made from three electrode sites, positioned over the visual cortex, relative to a mid frontal electrode. Each rec ording lasted 2 minutes, during which time fixation was monitored. The data from each recording were divided into 4 second segments, and the amplitude and phase of the VECP signal measured using the ANC. Hotell ing's t(2) statistic was applied to determine the probability of signa l detection. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to fin d the optimum signal detection threshold for identification of the vis ual field defects. Results-The results of the study confirmed patterns of subjective visual field loss. The technique had a sensitivity and a specificity of 81% and 85%, respectively, for detecting 'non-seeing' areas in the inferior visual field, and 82% and 89%, respectively, fo r detecting 'non-seeing' areas in the superior visual field. Conclusio n-These results demonstrate that the technique is of potential clinica l value to ophthalmologists and neurologists when subjective perimetry is not possible.