THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CYCLOSPORINE EMULSION VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE IN A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON IN PRIMARY RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS
G. Barone et al., THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CYCLOSPORINE EMULSION VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE IN A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON IN PRIMARY RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS, Transplantation, 61(6), 1996, pp. 968-970
A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter pharmacokinetic study
was conducted to compare the clinical safety and tolerability of cycl
osporine capsules and oral solution for microemulsion and cyclosporine
in 101 primary renal transplant recipients. Cyclosporine emulsion has
more complete absorption and improved bioavailability compared with c
yclosporine, and dosing of both cyclosporine formulations was adjusted
to achieve comparable whole-blood trough levels, Mean serum creatinin
e values were higher in the cyclosporine emulsion group at baseline, 8
, and 12 weeks (P<0.05), The incidence of acute rejection was similar
in both treatment groups although fewer patients required monoclonal a
ntibody therapy in the cyclosporine emulsion group than in the cyclosp
orine group (31% vs, 82%, respectively). Despite the increased bioavai
lability of cyclosporine emulsion, no significant differences in the i
ncidence of adverse events were observed; the safety, tolerability, an
d efficacy of cyclosporine emulsion and cyclosporine were comparable.