In the UK, critical loads have been mapped for both soils and freshwat
ers and the maps indicate that discrepancies may occur between these t
wo receptors over sensitive areas of the UK. Freshwater critical load
maps were prepared by calculating the Henriksen critical load for the
most sensitive water body in each 10 km grid square. Critical loads fo
r soils were calculated according to the mineralogy and associated soi
l properties of the dominant soil at a 1 km resolution. To examine the
differences between the soil and freshwater data sets it is necessary
to calculate critical loads at a smaller scale using the catchment as
the focus for study. This was done by selecting a catchment on granit
ic parent material in the North of Scotland. Data on water chemistry,
collected on a weekly basis, was used to calculate temporal variations
in critical loads for freshwaters using the Henriksen method. Soil sa
mpling across the catchment was conducted on a grid based system to pr
ovide estimates of spatial variability in sensitivity. Profile charact
eristics and soil chemical data obtained from detailed soil sampling p
rogrammes were used in the PROFILE model to determine the spatial vari
ation in critical loads for soils. In general, the results show that t
he critical loads for soils tend to be lower than those for freshwater
. The spatial variation in the soil critical load tends to be small wh
ilst the temporal variation in critical load for freshwaters is large.
in order to account for these differences it is important to identify
the key processes within the catchment which play a major role in con
trolling streamwater chemistry. This procedure improves the relationsh
ip between critical loads for soils and waters.