This descriptive, quasi-experimental study identified reflective reaso
ning aptitudes of nurses (N = 97) and investigated the effect of synec
tics on their creative thinking. Aptitude for reflective reasoning was
pretested by the Torrance Verbal Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT), th
e Gordon Creative Problem Solving Test(GCPST), and the Watson-Glaser A
ppraisal of Critical Thinking (WGACT). Subjects were posttested only i
n creative thinking, using the TTCT and the GCPST The experimental int
ervention was adapted from synectics under the tutelage of its invento
r, W.J.J. Gordon. The participants were randomly selected for either t
he experimental group (trained in synectics) or the control group (not
trained in synectics) and their pretest mean scores on the TTCT and W
GACT were compared with normative data from graduate students. The dif
ferences in critical thinking, fluency, and flexibility were insignifi
cant. Significant differences were found in originality. Posttest TTCT
and GCPST mean scores revealed significant gains for the experimental
group over the control group on all pretested creative abilities. Fin
dings reveal several potential strengths and one weakness in the refle
ctive reasoning of nurses. In addition, the educational intervention,
synectics, enhanced the creative abilities of nurses. It is recommende
d that further studies be conducted to expand the knowledge base on th
e reflective reasoning of nurses and that prospective research address
the interactive effect of personal attributes, environmental influenc
es, and cognitive skill training.