Js. Gavaler et al., BINGE VERSUS STEADY DRINKING - EFFECTS ON THE LIVER IN THE OVARIECTOMIZED RAT, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 17(2), 1993, pp. 355-358
Substantial interest exists as to whether or not differential effects
in liver injury based on the pattern of alcohol intake exist; and furt
her, if they do, are they simply a function of the total dose over tim
e. A rat model in which ethanol (ETOH) at doses of 12%, 24%, or 36% of
total calories was isocalorically administered for 4 months either da
ily or intermittently (4 days of ETOH, 3 days of control diet, repeate
dly) was used to assess this question. There were significant differen
ces in the two feeding pattern groups between 36% ETOH rats for the li
ver weight corrected for body weight, the fat infiltration score, the
total amount of ETOH consumed/mg body weight, the proportion of animal
s with a fat infiltration score >2, and albumin levels. There was a si
gnificant difference between 12% ETOH rats for the liver weight correc
ted for body weight. Of particular relevance is the comparison to be m
ade between Daily 12% ETOH and Binge 24% ETOH animals, because these t
wo groups consumed an identical total amount of ETOH/mg body weight (D
aily: 445 +/- 5 vs. Binge: 468 +/- 15) and thus these animals are comp
arable in terms of ETOH dose over time but different in terms of the p
attern of ETOH exposure. There were no differences in the liver/body r
atio (Daily: 235 +/- 6 vs. Binge: 232 +/- 4), fat infiltration score (
Daily: 2.5 +/- 4 vs. Binge: 2.4 +/-0.3), the proportion of animals wit
h a fat infiltration score >2 (Daily: 5/10 vs. Binge: 4/8), or albumin
levels (Daily: 3.0 +/- 0.1 vs. Binge: 3.1 +/- 0.1). These data, in ad
dition to the findings of greater injury in both the 12% and 36% ETOH
daily-fed animals, suggest that it is the cumulative amount, not the p
attern of ETOH intake, that determines the liver injury.