Research indicates that effortful performance are reduced when partici
pants cannot be evaluated, relative to when they can be evaluated. It
was hypothesized that mood would interact with goals to attenuate such
reductions in performance. As predicted when participants' goal was t
o do as much as they could, those in negative moods put forth more eff
ort and persisted longer than those in positive moods and performed eq
ually well whether or not they could be evaluated. In contrast, as pre
dicted, when participants' goal was to continue until they no longer e
njoyed the task, those in positive moods put forth more effort and per
sisted longer than those in negative moods; no-evaluation and evaluati
on conditions did not differ. For those in positive moods asked to do
as much as they could and those in negative moods asked to continue un
til they no longer enjoyed the task, no-evaluation participants perfor
med worse than evaluation participants.