Dl. Monticciolo et al., OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION-DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY - A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF RHODIUM VERSUS MOLYBDENUM, Southern medical journal, 89(4), 1996, pp. 391-394
Mammography was done with a conventional molybdenum anode/filter combi
nation and either a molybdenum/rhodium (Mo/Rh) or rhodium/rhodium (Rh/
Rh) combination to compare the contrast characteristics and penetratin
g ability of the different techniques. Each pair was rated as being eq
ual, one slightly better than the other, or one much better than the o
ther. The ''preferred'' image was also selected. The entrance surface
exposure and the mean glandular dose were determined for each exposure
. Mo/Mo was compared with Mo/Rh in 26 patients and to Rh/Rh in 23. Mo/
Mo was judged to produce better or equal contrast and penetration in a
ll cases except one using the Mo/Rh combination. Mo/Rh was the preferr
ed image only once and Rh/Rh not at all. In comparison to the conventi
onal Mo/Mo technique, the average dose was reduced by approximately 25
% with Mo/Rh and by 50% with Rh/Rh.