Public Choice should now integrate systematically considerations of et
hics and justice for two kinds of reasons. First, moral principles can
be implemented by self-centered individual who, however, care for oth
ers' judgments, and these others can thus have these principles implem
ented at no cost to themselves. Furthermore, direct moral motivations
may be less negligible than it was assumed, and at any rate it may be
time to focus on them. Second, the theory of justice has reached an in
tegrated, rational maturity which makes it suitable for this purpose (
whereas the ''Social Choice'' approach is plagued by serious problems
of meaning).