THE BEHAVIOR OF BUREAUCRATS AND THE CHOICE BETWEEN SINGLE-PURPOSE ANDMULTIPURPOSE AUTHORITIES

The constitutional choice between single-purpose and multi-purpose aut horities is analyzed in a model describing the local decision-making p rocess as a game between a sponsor; representing the voters, and two b ureaus. The bureaus are able to influence public decisions by using pr ivate information about production costs. In this context, the bureaus always benefit from coordinated cost reporting whereas the effect on voter welfare is shown to depend on the sign of the Cournot cross-pric e-elasticities. Given that collusion is more likely to occur in multi- purpose authorities, the analysis provides some guidelines when choosi ng between single-purpose and multi-purpose authorities.