Progress over the past 30 years has revealed many strengths of the rai
nbow trout as an alternative model for environmental carcinogenesis re
search. These include low rearing costs. an early life-stage ultrasens
itive bioassay, sensitivity to many classes of carcinogen, a well-desc
ribed tumor pathology, responsiveness to tumor promoters and inhibitor
s. and a mechanistically informative nonmammalian comparative status.
Low-cost husbandry, for example, has permitted statistically challengi
ng tumor study designs with up to 10,000 trout to investigate the quan
titative interrelationships among carcinogen dose, anticarcinogen dose
. DNA adduct formation. and final tumor outcome. The basic elements of
the trout carcinogen bioassay include multiple exposure routes, carci
nogen response, husbandry requirements, and pathology. The principal k
nown neoplasms occur in liver (mixed hepatocellular/cholangiocellular
adenoma and carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma), kidney (nephroblasto
ma), swim bladder (adenopapilloma), and stomach (adenopapilloma). Trou
t possess a complex but incompletely characterized array of cytochrome
s P450, transferases, and other enzymic systems for phase I and phase
II procarcinogen metabolism. In general, trout exhibit only limited ca
pacity for DNA repair, especially for removal of bulky DNA adducts. Th
is factor, together with a high capacity for P450 bioactivation and ne
gligible glutathione transferase-mediated detoxication of the epoxide,
accounts for the exceptional sensitivity of trout to aflatoxin B-1 ca
rcinogenesis. At the gene level. all trout tumors except nephroblastom
a exhibit variable and often high incidences of oncogenic Ki-ras gene
mutations. Mutations in the trout p53 tumor suppressor gene have yet t
o be described. There are many aspects of the trout model, especially
the lack of complete organ homology, that limit its application as a s
urrogate for human cancer research. Within these limitations, however,
it is apparent that trout and other fish models can serve as highly u
seful adjuncts to conventional rodent models in the study of environme
ntal carcinogenesis and its modulation. For some problems, fish models
can provide wholly unique approaches.