The effects on choice behavior of attempting to interfere with adult f
emales' counting and timing behaviors were examined using a self-contr
ol paradigm (choices between larger, more delayed and smaller, less de
layed reinforcers). Reinforcers consisted of opportunities to earn poi
nts exchangeable for money. There were four groups of 10 subjects each
: a control group and three groups that listened to a list of numbers
during the entire experiment, with two of these groups being asked to
perform a counting or a division task with the numbers. Subjects in th
e two task groups demonstrated more self-control and earned fewer rein
forcers than did subjects in the two no task groups. The results sugge
st that subjects with diminished cognitive capacity tend to choose the
alternative that gives them the greatest amount of reinforcement in a
given trial (the self-control alternative) and that they may not resp
ond so as to maximize overall reinforcement. (C) 1996 Academic Press,
Inc.