Sj. Bernstein et al., THE APPROPRIATENESS OF HYSTERECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF CARE IN 7 HEALTH PLANS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 269(18), 1993, pp. 2398-2402
Objective.-To develop and test a method for comparing the appropriaten
ess of hysterectomy use in different health plans. Design.-Retrospecti
ve cohort study. Setting.-Seven managed care organizations. Patients.-
Random sample of all nonemergency, nononcological hysterectomies perfo
rmed in the seven managed care organizations over a 1-year period. Pat
ients who were not continuously enrolled in a plan for 2 years prior t
o their hysterectomy were excluded. Main Outcome Measures.-Proportion
of women undergoing hysterectomy in each plan for inappropriate clinic
al reasons according to ratings derived from a panel of managed care p
hysicians. Results.-Overall, about 16% of women underwent hysterectomy
for reasons judged to be clinically inappropriate. Only one plan had
significantly more hysterectomies rated inappropriate compared with th
e group mean (27%, unadjusted). Adjusting for age and race did not aff
ect the rankings of the plans and had little effect on the numeric res
ults. Conclusion.-The rates of inappropriate use of hysterectomies are
similar to those for other procedures and vary to a small degree amon
g health plans. This information may be useful to purchasers when they
consider which health plans to offer their employees.