STUTTERING AND PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS IN CHILDREN - EXAMINATION OF THE COVERT REPAIR HYPOTHESIS

Citation
Js. Yaruss et Eg. Conture, STUTTERING AND PHONOLOGICAL DISORDERS IN CHILDREN - EXAMINATION OF THE COVERT REPAIR HYPOTHESIS, Journal of speech and hearing research, 39(2), 1996, pp. 349-364
Citations number
103
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics",Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
00224685
Volume
39
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
349 - 364
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4685(1996)39:2<349:SAPDIC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the Covert Repair Hy pothesis (CRH; Postma & Kolk, 1993), a theory designed to account for the occurrence of speech disfluencies in adults who stutter, can also account for selected speech characteristics of children who stutter an d demonstrate disordered phonology. Subjects were 9 boys who stutter a nd exhibit normal phonology (S + NP; mean age = 61.33 months; SD = 10. 16 months) and 9 boys who stutter and exhibit disordered phonology (S + DP; mean age = 59.11 months; SD = 9.37 months). Selected aspects of each child's speech fluency and phonology were analyzed on the basis o f an audio/videotaped picture-naming task and a 30-min conversational interaction with his mother. Results indicated that S + NP and S + DP children are generally comparable in terms of their basic speech disfl uency, nonsystematic speech error, and self-repair behaviors. CRH pred ictions that utterances produced with faster articulatory speaking rat es or shorter response time latencies are more likely to contain speec h errors or speech disfluencies were not supported. CRH predictions re garding the co-occurrence of speech disfluencies and speech errors wer e supported for nonsystematic (''slip-of-the-tongue''), but not for sy stematic (phonological process/rule-based), speech errors. Furthermore , neither S + NP nor S + DP subjects repaired their systematic speech errors during conversational speech, suggesting that systematic deviat ions from adult forms may not represent true ''errors,'' at least for some children exhibiting phonological processes. Findings suggest that speech disfluencies may not represent by-products of self-repairs of systematic speech errors produced during conversational speech, but th at self-repairs of nonsystematic speech errors may be related to child ren's production of speech disfluencies.