Ml. Santamaria et al., DONOR VASCULAR GRAFTS FOR ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION IN PEDIATRIC LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION, Journal of pediatric surgery, 31(4), 1996, pp. 600-603
The authors compared the results of 48 orthotopic liver transplantatio
ns (OLT) in which revascularization was achieved with a conduit interp
osed between the receptor aorta and the graft (vascular graft [VG] gro
up) with those obtained for 56 OLT performed during the same period (1
991 to 1994) in which end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) of the hepatic arte
ries or celiac trunk was used (EEA group). In the VG group, the interp
osed conduits were the cadaveric iliac artery (37) the living-donor sa
phenous vein (3), or nonthrombosed conduits from previous transplants
(8) (7 iliac arteries, 1 saphenous vein). There were significant diffe
rences between the two groups with respect to recipient age, recipient
weight, the retransplant:first transplant ratio, the number of emerge
ncy transplantations, the use of reduced-size grafts, and intraoperati
ve transfusion requirements. Twenty-nine grafts in the VG group (60.4%
) and 43 in the EEA group (76.7%) currently are functioning. The actua
rial 3-year graft survival rates are 60% and 71.5% for the VG and EEA
groups (P <.05), respectively. The rate of arterial thrombosis did not
differ between the two groups. The authors conclude that, although EE
A of the hepatic artery is still the preferred revascularization techn
ique for OLT, revascularization of the liver graft by conduit interpos
ition is safe when EEA is not possible. Reutilization of the interpose
d conduit during retransplantation proved to be safe in the absence of
hepatic artery thrombosis. (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company