The elongation factors G (EF-G) and Tu (EF-Tu) go through a number of
conformation states in their functional cycles. Since they both are GT
Pases, have similar G domains and domains II, and have similar interac
tions with the nucleotides, then GTP hydrolysis must occur in similar
ways. The crystal structures of two conformational states are known fo
r EF-G and three are known for EF-Tu. The conformations of EF-G . GDP
and EF-Tu . GTP are closely related. EF-Tu goes through a large confor
mational change upon GTP cleavage. This conformational change is to la
rge extent due to an altered interaction between the G domain and doma
ins II and III. II and III. A number of kirromycin-resistant mutations
are situated at the interface between domains I and m. The interface
between the G domain and domain V in EF-G corresponds with this dynami
c interface in EF-Tu. The contact area in EF-G is small and dominated
by interactions between charged amino acids, which are parr of a syste
m that is observed to undergo conformational changes. Furthermore, a n
umber of fusidic acid resistant mutants have been identified in this a
rea. All of this evidence makes it likely that EF-G undergoes a large
conformational change in its functional cycle. If the structures and c
onformational states of the elongation factors are related to a scheme
in which the ribosome oscillates between two conformations, the pretr
anslocational and posttranslocational states, a model is arrived at in
which EF-Tu drives the reaction in one direction and EF-G in the oppo
site. This may lead to the consequence that the GTP state of one facto
r is similar to the GDP state of the other. At the GTP hydrolysis stat
e, the structures of the factors will be close to superimposable.