MECHANICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO STRETCHING WITH AND WITHOUTPREISOMETRIC CONTRACTION IN HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE

Objective: To examine electromyography (EMG) activity, passive torque, and stretch perception during static stretch and contract-relax stret ch. Design: Two separate randomized crossover protocols: (1) a constan t angle protocol on the right side, and (2) a variable angle protocol on the left side. Subjects: 10 male volunteers. Intervention: Stretch- induced mechanical response in the hamstring muscles during passive kn ee extension was measured as knee flexion torque (Nm) while hamstring surface EMG was measured. Final position was determined by extending t he knee to an angle that provoked a sensation similar to a stretch man euver. Constant angle stretch: The knee was extended to 10 degrees bel ow final position, held 10sec, then extended to the final position and held for 80sec. Variable angle stretch: The knee was extended from th e starting position to 10 degrees below the final position, held 10sec , then extended to the onset of pain. Subjects produced a 6-sec isomet ric contraction with the hamstring muscles 10 degrees below the final position in the contract-relax stretch, but not in the static stretch. Main Outcome Measures: Passive torque, joint range of motion, velocit y, and hamstring EMG were continuously recorded. Results: Constant ang le contract-relax and static stretch did not differ in passive torque or EMG response. In the final position, passive torque declined 18% to 21% in both contract-relax and static stretch (p < .001), while EMG a ctivity was unchanged. In the variable angle protocol, maximal joint a ngle and corresponding passive torque were significantly greater in co ntract-relax compared with static stretch (p < .01), while EMG did not differ. Conclusion: At a constant angle the viscoelastic and EMG resp onse was unaffected by the isometric contraction. The variable angle p rotocol demonstrated that PNF stretching altered stretch perception. ( C) 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Am erican Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation