Jr. Jefferson et Pj. Mcgrath, BACK PAIN AND PERIPHERAL JOINT PAIN IN AN INDUSTRIAL-SETTING, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 77(4), 1996, pp. 385-390
Objective: To develop a self-reported low back pain (LBP) questionnair
e and assess its usefulness in (I)describing the incidence of LBP in a
n industrial setting, compared to medical records and workers' compens
ation statistics; and (2) targeting specific work sites where the leve
ls and patterns of pain suggest a need for specific intervention. Desi
gn: Survey data used from questionnaires, company medical records, and
workers' compensation statistics. Setting: Industrial work site: airc
raft engine factory. Participants: All employees (n = 306). Interventi
ons: Questionnaire data, including LBP history, demographics, and body
pain diagram scores, were compared to medical records and workers' co
mpensation data over a 1-year period. The body pain diagram quantified
on a scale of 0 to 10 the subjective level of pain ''at the end of an
average shift'' for six body regions. Main Outcome Measures: Pain dia
gram scores for different body regions were compared using Pearson Pro
duct correlations. Intercorrelations of body region pain scores were e
xamined by factor analysis. Differences in mean LBP scores according t
o history and demographics were compared using paired t tests and ANOV
A (p = .05). Results: The 1-year incidence of LBP by questionnaire was
69.3%. Occupational Health records revealed only 27% of the same work
force formally complained of LBP, while only 2.3% of the workforce los
t time from work because of LBP. A clinically significant level of LBP
was reported by 41% of respondents. Their level of LBP was not relate
d to history of LBP, age, height, weight, smoking history, or amount o
f time in their job. Their level of LBP was somewhat related to their
level of neck and peripheral joint pain. Conclusions: This questionnai
re appears to be potentially useful in (1) identifying workers who are
symptomatic at an early stage of their LBP problem; and (2) identifyi
ng pain patterns in different areas of the plant. (C) by the American
Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physic
al Medicine and Rehabilitation