QUANTUM DECOHERENCE AND THE ISOTOPE EFFECT IN CONDENSED-PHASE NONADIABATIC MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS

Citation
Bj. Schwartz et al., QUANTUM DECOHERENCE AND THE ISOTOPE EFFECT IN CONDENSED-PHASE NONADIABATIC MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS, The Journal of chemical physics, 104(15), 1996, pp. 5942-5955
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Physics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
ISSN journal
00219606
Volume
104
Issue
15
Year of publication
1996
Pages
5942 - 5955
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9606(1996)104:15<5942:QDATIE>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
In this paper, we explore in detail the way in which quantum decoheren ce is treated in different mixed quantum-classical molecular dynamics algorithms. The quantum decoherence time proves to be a key ingredient in the production of accurate nonadiabatic dynamics from computer sim ulations. Based on a short time expansion to a semiclassical golden ru le expression due to Neria and Nitzan [J. Chem. Phys. 99, 1109 (1993)] , we develop anew computationally efficient method for estimating the decay of quantum coherence in condensed phase molecular simulations. U sing the hydrated electron as an example, application of this method f inds that quantum decoherence times are on the order of a few femtosec onds for condensed phase chemical systems and that they play a direct role in determining nonadiabatic transition rates. The decay of quantu m coherence for the solvated electron is found to take approximate to 50% longer in D2O than in H2O, providing a rationalization for a long standing puzzle concerning the lack of experimentally observed isotope effect on the nonadiabatic transition rate: Although the nonadiabatic coupling is smaller in D2O due to smaller nuclear velocities, the sma ller coupling in D2O adds coherently for a longer time than in H2O, le ading to nearly identical nonadiabatic transition rates. The implicati ons of this isotope dependence of the nonadiabatic transition rate on changes in the quantum decoherence time for electron transfer and othe r important chemical reactions are discussed. (C) 1996 American Instit ute of Physics.