EVIDENCE FOR THE DISTINCTNESS OF EMBARRASSMENT, SHAME, AND GUILT - A STUDY OF RECALLED ANTECEDENTS AND FACIAL EXPRESSIONS OF EMOTION

Citation
D. Keltner et Bn. Buswell, EVIDENCE FOR THE DISTINCTNESS OF EMBARRASSMENT, SHAME, AND GUILT - A STUDY OF RECALLED ANTECEDENTS AND FACIAL EXPRESSIONS OF EMOTION, Cognition and emotion, 10(2), 1996, pp. 155-171
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental
Journal title
ISSN journal
02699931
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
155 - 171
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9931(1996)10:2<155:EFTDOE>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Following proposals regarding the criteria for differentiating emotion s, the current investigation examined whether the antecedents and faci al expressions of embarrassment, shame, and guilt are distinct. In Stu dy 1, participants wrote down events that had caused them to feel emba rrassment, shame, and guilt. Coding of these events revealed that emba rrassment was associated with transgressions of conventions that gover n public interactions, shame with the failure to meet important person al standards, and guilt with actions that harm others or violate dutie s. Study 2 determined whether these three emotions are distinct in ano ther domain of emotion-namely, facial expression. Observers were prese nted with slides of 14 different facial expressions, including those o f embarrassment, shame, and candidates of guilt (self-contempt, sympat hy, and pain). Observers accurately identified the expressions of emba rrassment and shame, but did not reliably label any expression as guil t.