This study examined whether differential response patterns are associa
ted with the emotions of fear and anger as compared to neutral and phy
sical action imagery conditions in 27 right-handed male volunteers scr
eened for imagery ability and alexithymia. Fear, anger, neutral, and a
ction states Were significantly differentiated on the basis of autonom
ic measures and facial electromyographic (EMG) responses. Discriminant
function analyses (DFAs) using autonomic and facial EMG measures cond
ucted separately on data from two experimental sessions revealed 78% a
nd 72% correct classification of fear and anger, and neutral condition
s, respectively. Cross-validation of the DFA using discriminant weight
s of the first session to classify the second session data led to a 66
.5% correct classification of the fear and anger, and neutral imagery
conditions. The combined average of both sessions revealed an 84% corr
ect classification rate. Further, when subjective ratings were added t
o the discriminant function as a manipulation check for the experiment
al procedure, a 99% correct classification rate was obtained. These da
ta indicate that emotion-specific response patterns for fear and anger
are accurately differentiable from each other and from neutral imager
y conditions. The findings provide support for the cognitive-physiolog
ical network models of physiological emotion specificity.