Much has been written in U.S. feminist scholarship about ''French femi
nism'', but few French feminists recognize themselves or their movemen
t in these studies. This article looks at this disjuncture between the
American version of ''French feminism'' and the movement whose practi
ce and theory had an impact on French politics, culture, and society o
ver the past two decades. The premise of the article is that the disju
ncture is not simply a matter of ''getting the story wrong''. Although
I describe (very briefly) the movement that feminist activists and sc
holars have constructed for themselves, the interest of this paper is
more so on the construction of knowledge in the U.S. and the impact of
U.S. feminist scholarship on the French movement. In the American con
struction of ''French feminism'', theorists Helene Cixous, Julia Krist
eva, and Luce Irigaray, along with the group Psychanalyse et politique
, are the significant exemplars. Theory is privileged over activism, p
oststructuralism over materialist theories, literary and philosophical
discourse over the social and historical.