1. Nine subjects received 6 baseline and 24 training sessions, each co
nsisting of 250 elbow joint stretch perturbations into extension. The
training sessions were designed to reduce the subjects' biceps brachii
spinal stretch reflexes (SSR). Changes in longer-latency responses an
d short-latency brachioradialis responses were also monitored. Backgro
und electromyogram activity was recorded from the lateral head of tric
eps brachii during the biceps sampling intervals. These data were comp
ared with those from 12 control subjects who received equal numbers of
stretches over an extended baseline (i.e., without application of a t
raining paradigm). 2. Training subjects reduced their mean biceps SSR
responses by 24%, whereas control subjects increased their responses b
y 12%. When changes in activity were grouped by sets of six consecutiv
e sessions following the baseline interval, a group-by-time interactio
n was observed. Training subjects showed significant reductions from b
aseline after the first training set. The increased magnitude of bicep
s SSR for control subjects was significantly larger than baseline in s
ets 2-5. After the first training interval, all subsequent differences
between groups were statistically significant. 3. The brachioradialis
showed greater response variability, but these responses paralleled t
hose seen in biceps brachii. The training group reduced their brachior
adialis responses by 18%, whereas the control group increased their re
sponses by 12%. Background activity recorded over the lateral head of
triceps brachii during the biceps brachii SSR window became smaller in
both groups. 4. Comparison of data between control subjects and subje
cts who had undergone biceps SSR up-training in previous studies sugge
sts that the small increase seen among the present control subjects wa
s probably not the result of a direct training effect. 5. Baseline dif
ferences in longer-latency response onset time were seen between group
s. Over extended baseline sessions, longer-latency responses showed on
ly a 1% later onset, representing a change of 0.3 ms, in the control g
roup. A 1.3% later onset, equaling a change of 1.1 ms, was observed ov
er conditioning ses sions in the training group. When analyzed by sets
following baseline, neither group showed significant within- or betwe
en-group changes over time. 6. The magnitude of the longer-latency bic
eps brachii responses showed 7% and 37% reductions for the control and
training groups, respectively. No difference in set averages was seen
within groups, but a significant difference was measured over sets 2-
4 between groups. Reductions in the magnitude of longer-latency respon
ses in training subjects were more obvious in later training sessions.
7. These data suggest that 1) the biceps brachii SSR can be reduced i
n human subjects; 2) concurrent changes are often observed in the syne
rgist brachioradialis; and 3) the reduced biceps SSR magnitude is not
linked to a compensatory increase in antagonist muscle activity. Reduc
tions in the magnitude of longer-latency biceps brachii activity seen
in parallel with the decreased SSR may imply that some degree of supra
spinal processing is required to achieve this task.