A prospective, randomized, double-blind study investigating the effica
cy of intranasal meperidine as compared with intravenous (IV) administ
ration for postoperative pain relief is described. The study was limit
ed to the initial titration of pain relief during a 2-h period immedia
tely after surgery. Sixty women having undergone a hysterectomy were s
tudied. Initially and when complaining of a pain intensity greater-tha
n-or-equal-to 40 on the 101-point numerical rating scale (NRS), 30 pat
ients received 6 s prays (27 mg) meperidine intranasally and simultane
ously 6 mL NaCl 0.9% IV (nasal group); another 30 patients received 6
sprays of NaCl 0.9% intranasally and 6 mL of a diluted meperidine solu
tion (27 mg) IV (intravenous group). Patients already having a pain re
duction < 40 on the 101-point NRS, received half of the above dose. Me
peridine was repeated every 5 min until the patients were pain free or
refused further analgesic. Before the onset of meperidine titration a
nd at 5- to 10-min intervals for 2 h thereafter, pain was evaluated wi
th a 101-point NRS and a verbal rating scale. Within 20 and 35 min the
pain scores evaluated by the NRS and verbal rating scale decreased in
the intravenous and nasal group to a median of zero. The total dose o
f meperidine was 76.5 mg (range, 40.5-135.0) in the intravenous group
and 104.4 mg (range, 27-135.0) in the nasal group (P < 0.05). One pati
ent in each group showed a brief decrease in arterial hemoglobin oxyge
n saturation to <90%. No patient complained of pain or burning in the
nose. Intranasal meperidine titration is suitable for demand-adjusted
titration, and provides a fast-acting and efficacious analgesia.