ESTHESIONEUROBLASTOMA - PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT

Citation
A. Morita et al., ESTHESIONEUROBLASTOMA - PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT, Neurosurgery, 32(5), 1993, pp. 706-715
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0148396X
Volume
32
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
706 - 715
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-396X(1993)32:5<706:E-PAM>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
FORTY-NINE PATIENTS WITH esthesioneuroblastoma were treated at the May o Clinic between 1951 and 1990. Their clinical manifestations and trea tment results were reviewed to identify possible prognostic factors. T he 5-year survival rate for all patients was 69%. Tumor progression oc curred in 25 patients (51%; no local control in 6 and local recurrence in 19). Metastasis was found in is patients (31%; regional in 10 and distant in 9). Nineteen patients died directly from metastatic or intr acranial tumor extension. The pathological grade of the tumor was the most significant prognostic factor identified. The 5-year survival rat e was 80% for the low-grade tumors and 40% for the high-grade tumors ( P = 0.0001). Surgical treatment alone is effective for low-grade tumor s if tumor-free margins can be obtained. Radiation is used for low-gra de tumors when margins are close, for residual or recurrent disease, a nd for all high-grade cancers. The poor prognosis associated with high -grade tumors may also mandate the addition of chemotherapy. Recurrent tumor and regional metastasis should be treated aggressively because this approach has been shown to be worthwhile. A craniofacial resectio n is now the surgical procedure performed in all cases. Because recurr ence can occur after 5 or even 10 years, long-term follow-up is mandat ory.