Theoretical accounts of participation in collective action have become
more divergent. Some analysts employ the Prisoner's Dilemma paradigm,
other analysts suggest that different social dilemmas underlie collec
tive action, and still others deny that social dilemmas play any signi
ficant role in collective action. I propose a theoretically exhaustive
inventory of the dilemmas arising in collective action systems and sh
ow that five games, including the Prisoner's Dilemma, can underlie col
lective action. To analyze action within each game I use a dynamic sel
ectionist model based on three modes of organization-voluntary coopera
tion, strategic interaction and selective incentives. Social dilemmas
exist in four of the five games, and conflicting accounts of collectiv
e action have focused on different games and modes of organization As
collective action proceeds from initiation to rapid expansion to stabi
lity, its game type varies in a way that can be precisely characterize
d as movement through a two-dimensional game-space. Finally, I disting
uish between two ways of promoting collective action: One way focuses
on resolving the dilemma within a particular game; the other focuses o
n changing the game so the dilemma is more easily resolved or eliminat
ed.