We tested the hypothesis that exercise training with maximal eccentric
(lengthening) muscle actions results in greater gains in muscle stren
gth and size than training with concentric (shortening) actions. Chang
es in muscle strength, muscle fiber size, and surface electromyographi
c (EMG) activity of the quadriceps muscle were compared after 36 sessi
ons of isokinetic concentric (n = 8) or eccentric (n = 7) exercise tra
ining over 12 wb with use of a one-leg model. Eccentric training incre
ased eccentric strength 3.5 times more (pre/post 46%, P < 0.05) than c
oncentric training increased concentric strength (pre/post 13%). Eccen
tric training increased concentric strength and concentric training in
creased eccentric strength by about the same magnitude (5 and 10%, res
pectively, P > 0.05). Eccentric training increased EMG activity seven
times more during eccentric testing (pre/post 86%, P < 0.05) than conc
entric training increased EMG activity during concentric testing (pre/
post 12%). Eccentric training increased the EMC activity measured duri
ng concentric tests and concentric training increased the EMG activity
measured during eccentric tests by about the same magnitude (8 and 11
%, respectively, P > 0.05). Type I muscle fiber percentages did not ch
ange significantly, but type IIa fibers increased and type IIb fibers
decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in both training groups. Type I fib
er areas did not change significantly (P > 0.05), but type II fiber ar
ea increased similar to 10 times more (P < 0.05) in the eccentric than
in the concentric group. It is concluded that adaptations to training
with maximal eccentric contractions are specific to eccentric muscle
actions that are associated with greater neural adaptation and muscle
hypertrophy than concentric exercise.