Nd. Barlow et al., A MODEL FOR THE EFFECT OF SPHECOPHAGA-VESPARUM-VESPARUM AS A BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL AGENT OF THE COMMON WASP IN NEW-ZEALAND, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(1), 1996, pp. 31-44
1. A model of intermediate complexity is described to predict and unde
rstand the reasons for the ultimate impact of Sphecophaga vesparum ves
parum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), introduced as a classical biologic
al control agent of Vespula vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in New Ze
aland. The model was parameterized as far as possible from independent
field data then fitted to the observed performance of the parasitoid
over the first 5 years after release. 2. Wasp nest densities monitored
over 5 years and seven sites in beech (Nothofagus spp.) forests avera
ged 12.2 ha(-1), with a maximum of 33 ha(-1). These are among the high
est Vespula densities in the world. A Ricker model accounted for chang
es in nest density from year to year, giving a maximum ratio of increa
se in nest density of 3.3 per year and overcompensating density depend
ence at high densities, probably caused by queen competition and nest
usurpation in spring. 3. The parasitoid has established at low levels
in two sites, one of which has been studied in detail. Here parasitism
levels (% autumn nests parasitized) have remained around 5% for 5 yea
rs, with a slight suggestion of an upward trend. 4. The model suggests
that ultimate parasitism levels depend almost entirely on the parasit
oid's effective ratio of increase, R, defined as the maximum number of
spring adults produced per spring adult (spanning several intermediat
e summer generations). Ultimate suppression of wasp nest densities dep
ends on R, the rate of increase in parasitism within a year, and the m
ortality of parasitized early spring nests. The initial rate of build-
up of parasitism additionally depends on the pattern of emergence of p
arasitoid cocoons, which may extend over 4 years. 5. R for S. vesparum
vesparum at the site where it has established appears to be about 1.3
-1.6, which is close to the lower limit of 1 for persistence. Such val
ues suggest an ultimate suppression of wasp nest density and level of
parasitism of about 10% and 25%, respectively. 6. The low value of R a
t this site and the parasitoid's limited likely impact, appear to be d
ue to a combination of delayed emergence of overwintering cocoons, low
overwintering cocoon survival, and low production of cocoons per para
sitized autumn nest. Additionally, a reduced or variable attack rate m
ay contribute to the parasitoid's lack of establishment at other sites
, possibly due to poor synchrony between spring emergence of wasp quee
ns and adult parasitoids.7. A more successful parasitoid species or ec
otype would need to have a higher R value, which requires cocoon emerg
ence after 1 year rather than 2 or more, and/or higher values for the
above parameters, particularly overwintering survival of cocoons. In a
ddition, it would have to: act after the spring host density dependenc
e; cause a high (> 80%) mortality of parasitized spring nests; and ide
ally also reduce queen output from autumn nests. An alternative to an
agent causing mortality to spring nests would be a microbial one which
significantly reduced queen fertility without impairing her competiti
ve ability. 8. A 50% reduction in queen output from autumn nests, due
to parasitism by S. vesparum vesparum, contributes little to host supp
ression because of its timing relative to host density dependence. If
an alternative agent reduced wasp densities to a greater extent, the a
dditional contribution of reduced queen output would become relatively
more significant as density declined and the density dependence becam
e less intense.