QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTRATHECAL IGG SYNTHESIS BY ISOELECTRIC-FOCUSING AND IMMUNODETECTION - INTERLABORATORY REPRODUCIBILITY AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT

Citation
F. Sellebjerg et M. Christiansen, QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTRATHECAL IGG SYNTHESIS BY ISOELECTRIC-FOCUSING AND IMMUNODETECTION - INTERLABORATORY REPRODUCIBILITY AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT, Scandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation, 56(2), 1996, pp. 135-143
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental
ISSN journal
00365513
Volume
56
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
135 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5513(1996)56:2<135:QAOIIS>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Detection of intrathecal IgG synthesis is important in patients with s uspected multiple sclerosis (MS). The recommended method for the detec tion of intrathecal synthesis of IgG is isoelectric focusing and immun odetection of oligoclonal bands. Recently ''The Committee for European Concerted Action for Multiple Sclerosis'' has recommended that the re sults of isoelectric focusing for the detection of intrathecal synthes is of oligoclonal bands should not only be stated as positive or negat ive for intrathecal synthesis; instead, the laboratory should provide a detailed description of the IgG pattern in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum together with a conclusion concerning the presence of intrathecal synthesis. We studied the interlaboratory reproducibility and interobserver agreement of isoelectric focusing, and the recommend ed classification system for the assessment of intrathecal IgG synthes is, in two separate patient groups employing kappa statistics. We foun d a high degree of interlaboratory reproducibility (133 patients; kapp a = 0.95 +/- 0.05) and interobserver agreement (356 patients; kappa = 0.97 +/- 0.04) when the presence or absence of intrathecal IgG synthes is was assessed. The agreement was less pronounced, although still ful ly satisfactory, when the results were classified according to the det ailed system by two laboratories (133 patients; kappa = 0.86 +/- 0.08) and two observers (356 patients; kappa = 0.88 +/- 0.08). Two specific problems in the interpretation of isoelectric focusing patterns were identified: one related to the discrimination of a pattern with severa l closely spaced bands which may represent a monoclonal protein; the o ther related to determining whether systemic band synthesis was presen t. We conclude that isoelectric focusing and immunodetection is a very reproducible technique for the detection of intrathecal Ige synthesis . Well defined criteria and extensive standardization may, however, be necessary when more elaborate classification systems are employed.