We review the assumptions and predictions of five competitive distribu
tion models that predict how optimal foragers will be distributed acro
ss resource patches when gains are reduced by interference. This revie
w revealed a number of previously ignored predictions and assumptions:
in particular, there should be no change in relative patch use as com
petitor density changes. A new model is proposed in which interference
results from the costs of encounters with other foragers and where th
e gains on a patch are independent of the costs of interference. This
model predicts that as density increases, there will be increased prop
ortional use of lower-quality patches. Past empirical studies of inter
ference distributions are reanalyzed; none of the studies provides str
ong support for any of the existing ideal free-distribution models. We
suggest that previous results are more consistent with the prediction
s of our new model.