Ra. Meisch et al., ORALLY SELF-ADMINISTERED COCAINE IN RHESUS-MONKEYS - TRANSITION FROM NEGATIVE OR NEUTRAL BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS TO POSITIVE REINFORCING EFFECTS, Drug and alcohol dependence, 32(2), 1993, pp. 143-158
The establishment of orally delivered cocaine as a reinforcer was exam
ined with nine rhesus monkeys. A 2% ethanol solution served as a reinf
orcer for all nine monkeys, for it maintained substantially higher res
ponse rates than did the concurrently available water vehicle. A test
was initially conducted to determine whether cocaine would function as
a reinforcer when substituted for 2% ethanol. When an intermediate co
caine concentration (0.2 mg/ml) was substituted for the ethanol soluti
on, the drug maintained behavior at rates less than (seven monkeys), e
qual to (one monkey), or greater than (one monkey) those maintained by
water. Thus, for eight of nine monkeys simple substitution of cocaine
for ethanol was not sufficient to establish orally delivered cocaine
as a reinforcer. In the next phase a stimulus-fading procedure was use
d. Blocks of training and testing sessions alternated. Across blocks o
f training sessions, increasing amounts of cocaine (0.0125, 0.025, 0.0
5, 0.1 mg/ml) were added to the 2% ethanol solution and subsequently t
he ethanol concentration was gradually decreased until only the 0.1 mg
/ml cocaine solution remained; water was always concurrently available
. Between each block of training sessions, a block of test sessions wa
s inserted. Test sessions compared relative rates of responding mainta
ined by two concurrently available drug solutions: (1) a solution cont
aining the combination of ethanol and cocaine used in the prior traini
ng block and (2) a solution containing the same concentration of ethan
ol but with no cocaine. Thus, differences in rates of behavior maintai
ned by the two solutions could be attributed to the presence of cocain
e and the existence and degree of any such differences could be monito
red at each step in the acquisition procedure. The outcome of the trai
ning procedure was that cocaine came to function as a reinforcer for s
ix of the eight monkeys tested (the ninth monkey was not put through t
he fading procedure, having shown higher cocaine than vehicle rates du
ring the initial substitution procedure). During the phase when ethano
l was faded from the drug solution, differences between the combinatio
n cocaine-ethanol solution and the ethanol-only solution emerged: for
the six monkeys that developed cocaine reinforced behavior, the combin
ation solution maintained higher rates of responding than the ethanol
solution alone. The opposite results were obtained with the remaining
two monkeys. That cocaine had been established as a reinforcer was con
firmed by persistent and orderly responding when dose and fixed-ratio
size were subsequently varied.