The surface of 243 Ida is dominated by the effects of impacts. No comp
lex crater morphologies are observed. A complete range of crater degra
dation states is present, which also reveals optical maturation of the
surface (darkening and reddening of materials with increasing exposur
e age), Regions of bright material associated with the freshest crater
s might be ballistically emplaced deposits or the result of seismic di
sturbance of loosely-bound surface materials. Diameter/depth ratios fo
r fresh craters on Ida are similar to 1:6.5, similar to Gaspra results
, but greater than the 1:5 ratios common on other rocky bodies. Contri
buting causes include rim degradation by whole-body ''ringing,'' relat
ively thin ejecta blankets around crater rims, or an extended strength
gradient in near-surface materials due to low gravitational self-pack
ing, Grooves probably represent expressions in surface debris of react
ivated fractures in the deeper interior, Isolated positive relief feat
ures as large as 150 m are probably ejecta blocks related to large imp
acts. Evidence for the presence of debris on the surface includes reso
lved ejecta blocks, mass-wasting scars, contrasts in color and albedo
of fresh crater materials, and albedo streaks oriented down local slop
es. Color data indicate relatively uniform calcium abundance in pyroxe
nes and constant pyroxene/olivine ratio. A large, relatively blue unit
across the northern polar area is probably related to regolith proces
ses involving ejecta from Azzurra rather than representing internal co
mpositional heterogeneity. A small number of bluer, brighter craters a
re randomly distributed across the surface, unlike on Gaspra where the
se features are concentrated along ridges. This implies that debris on
Ida is less mobile and/or consistently thicker than on Gaspra. Estima
tes of the average depth of mobile materials derived from chute depths
(20-60 m), grooves (greater than or equal to 30 m), and shallowing of
the largest degraded craters (20-50 m minimum, similar to 100 m maxim
um) suggest a thickness of potentially mobile materials of similar to
50 m, and a typical thickness for the debris layer of 50-100 m. (C) 19
96 Academic Press, Inc.