EFFECTS OF WEIGHT AND ENERGY CONTENT OF PRELOADS ON SUBSEQUENT APPETITE AND FOOD-INTAKE

Citation
G. Degraaf et T. Hulshof, EFFECTS OF WEIGHT AND ENERGY CONTENT OF PRELOADS ON SUBSEQUENT APPETITE AND FOOD-INTAKE, Appetite, 26(2), 1996, pp. 139-151
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Nutrition & Dietetics","Nutrition & Dietetics
Journal title
ISSN journal
01956663
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
139 - 151
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6663(1996)26:2<139:EOWAEC>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
This study was done to determine the relative effects of energy conten t and weight of ingested food on subsequent satiety and food intake. T he weight/volume and the energy content of nine preloads were manipula ted, in a 3 x 3 factorial design, to give three weight levels, 250, 50 0 and 750 g, and three energy levels 0, 1.26 and 2.51 MJ (0, 300 and 6 00 kcal). The weights were varied by the addition of water, while the energy levels were varied by using yogurt and cream. Each of the 1.26 and 2.51 MJ preloads contained 27 g of protein and 31 g of carbohydrat es. The 1.26 MJ preloads contained 8 g of fat and the 2.51 MJ preloads had 41 g of fat. Each of the nine preloads was presented as a lunch t o 21 female and 16 male subjects. Two hours after the preloads, subjec ts consumed sweet and savory snacks and various drinks ad libitum from a buffet. The weight of the preload had a small but statistically sig nificant effect on feelings of hunger and satiety between preload and buffet, and on energy intake during the buffet (5.34, 5.05 and 5.04 MJ after 250, 500 and 750 g preloads). There was a large difference betw een 0 and 1.26 MJ, but little difference in effect between 1.26 and 2. 51 MJ preloads. Mean energy intakes in the buffet after the 0, 1.26 an d 2.51 MJ preloads were 6.17, 4.83 and 4.42 MJ. These results suggest that the weight or amount of food affects subsequent appetite and food intake, but the effect of energy is stronger. (C) 1996 Academic Press Limited