N. Milpied et al., ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT IS NOT BETTER THAN AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANT FOR PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED HODGKINS-DISEASE, Journal of clinical oncology, 14(4), 1996, pp. 1291-1296
Purpose: To compare the results achieved with myeloablative therapy fo
llowed by either allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) or a
utologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for patients with Hodgkin
's disease (HD). Patients and Methods: Of more than 1,200 patients wit
h HD reported to the European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) regis
try, 49 underwent alloBMT. Of these, 45 with sufficient data were matc
hed to 45 patients who underwent ABMT. The matching criteria were sex,
age at time of transplantation, stage of the disease at diagnosis, bo
ne marrow involvement at diagnosis and at transplantation, year of tra
nsplantation, disease status at time of transplantation, time from dia
gnosis to transplantation, and conditioning regimen with or without to
tal-body irradiation (TBI). Results: The 4-year actuarial probabilitie
s of survival, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, and non-relap
se mortality were 25%, 15%, 61%, and 48% and 37%, 24%, 61%, and 27% af
ter alloBMT and ABMT, respectively. The toxic death rate at 4 years wa
s significantly higher for alloBMT patients (P = .04). For patients wi
th sensitive disease at the rime of transplantation, the 4-year actuar
ial probability of survival wets 30% after alloBMT and 64% after ABMT
(P = .007). This difference is mainly due to a higher transplant-relat
ed mortality rate after alloBMT (65% v 12%, P = .005). Acute graft-ver
sus-host disease (aGVHD) greater than or equal to grade II was associa
ted with a significantly lower risk of relapse, but also with a lower
overall survival (OS) rate. Conclusion: Based on this study, alloBMT f
rom a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor does not a
ppear to offer any advantage when compared with ABMT. A graft-versus-H
odgkin effect is associated with greater than or equal to grade II aGV
HD, but its positive effect on relapse is largely offset by its toxici
ty. In most circumstances, alloBMT cannot be recommended for patients
with HD. (C) l996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.