RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE AUDIT - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COMMITTEES

Citation
Me. Redshaw et al., RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE AUDIT - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COMMITTEES, Journal of medical ethics, 22(2), 1996, pp. 78-82
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Philosophy,"Social Issues","Medicine, Legal","Medicine, Legal
Journal title
ISSN journal
03066800
Volume
22
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
78 - 82
Database
ISI
SICI code
0306-6800(1996)22:2<78:RECA-D>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The same research proposal was submitted to 24 district health authori ty (DHA) research ethics committees in different parts of the country. The objective was to obtain permission for a multi-centre research pr oject. The study of neonatal care in different types of unit (regional , subregional and district), required that four health authorities wer e approached in each of six widely separated health regions in England . Data were collected and compared concerning aspects of processing, i ncluding application forms, information required, timing and decision- making. The key finding was that ethics committees received and proces sed the applications variably, reflecting individual factors and local problems. To improve consensus and facilitate multi-centre studies, s tandard forms and instructions are suggested and the establishment of a national committee or advisory group advocated.