C. Meyers et Rd. Woods, AN OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE ABORTION SERVICES - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PHYSICIANS REFUSE, Journal of medical ethics, 22(2), 1996, pp. 115-120
Access to abortion services in the United States continues to decline.
It does so not because of significant changes in legislation or court
rulings but because fewer and fewer physicians wish to perform aborti
ons and because most states now have ''conscientious objection'' legis
lation that makes it easy for physicians to refuse to do so. We argue
in this paper that physicians have an obligation to perform all social
ly sanctioned medical services, including abortions, and thus that the
burden of justification lies upon those who wish to be excused from t
hat obligation. That is, such persons should have to show how requirin
g them to perform abortions would represent a serious threat to their
fundamental moral or religious beliefs. We use current California law
as an example of legislation that does not take physicians' obligation
s into account and thus allows them too easily to declare conscientiou
s objection.