AN OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE ABORTION SERVICES - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PHYSICIANS REFUSE

Authors
Citation
C. Meyers et Rd. Woods, AN OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE ABORTION SERVICES - WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PHYSICIANS REFUSE, Journal of medical ethics, 22(2), 1996, pp. 115-120
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Philosophy,"Social Issues","Medicine, Legal","Medicine, Legal
Journal title
ISSN journal
03066800
Volume
22
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
115 - 120
Database
ISI
SICI code
0306-6800(1996)22:2<115:AOTPAS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Access to abortion services in the United States continues to decline. It does so not because of significant changes in legislation or court rulings but because fewer and fewer physicians wish to perform aborti ons and because most states now have ''conscientious objection'' legis lation that makes it easy for physicians to refuse to do so. We argue in this paper that physicians have an obligation to perform all social ly sanctioned medical services, including abortions, and thus that the burden of justification lies upon those who wish to be excused from t hat obligation. That is, such persons should have to show how requirin g them to perform abortions would represent a serious threat to their fundamental moral or religious beliefs. We use current California law as an example of legislation that does not take physicians' obligation s into account and thus allows them too easily to declare conscientiou s objection.