The author maintains that the quality of medical education has been dr
opping for the last few decades as medical schools become less and les
s focused on their primary purpose of training physicians. Until the y
ears immediately following World War II, the administration of the med
ical school was carried out by a small staff headed by a dean whose ro
le was to provide leadership in educational matters. Academic departme
nts managed the educational program, and the faculty were expected to
be teachers and to participate in educational planning, preparation of
teaching materials, advising of students, assessment of students' per
formances, admission, and all other tasks associated with having a tea
ching position. Today, the administration of a typical school includes
any number of assistants to the dean and a wide variety of other staf
f dealing not only with educational functions but with grant managemen
t, public relations, fund-raising, personnel policy budgeting, and an
enormous and complex parallel structure designed to manage clinical pr
actice and to respond to market pressures, The role of faculty has als
o changed greatly; faculty are expected to be researchers and clinicia
ns first, and teaching is usually shortchanged. The author explains wh
y he believes these changes have come about; for example, the strong f
ederal support of research after World War II, which encouraged a grow
ing dependence of medical schools on research grants and consequently
raised in importance those faculty who could obtain such grants. He co
ncludes with commonsense proposals for reform (such as having the educ
ation of medical students in the hands of a small number of faculty wh
ose prime responsibility is teaching), but admits that there are funda
mental barriers to such reforms, especially vested interests and resis
tance to change. In the end, change will come only when those in power
recognize that medical schools must be returned to their primary role
of training physicians.