C. Rickers et al., PSEUDOINFARCTION AFTER PLACEMENT OF AN EP ICARDIAL ICD PATCH ELECTRODE - DIFFERENTIATION BY SPECT AND PET, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 85(3), 1996, pp. 198-203
A 64-year-old male who received an implantable cardioverter defibrilla
tor with epicardial patch electrodes in 1990 was admitted to the emerg
ency room because of recurrent defibrillator shocks. During the follow
ing diagnostic work-up a remarkable discrepancy between coronary angio
graphy (no significant stenosis), (201)Thallium-SPECT imaging (antero-
septal persistent defect) and PET imaging (no (18)FDG defect) was noti
ced. In order to assess the impact of the epicardial defibrillator pat
ch electrodes on the imaging, we performed SPECT and PET measurements
using a thorax phantom. We found that in Tl-201-SPECT an epicardial pa
tch caused a significant (up to 20%) photon attenuation, which may lea
d to the phenomenon of ''pseudoinfarction''. On PET images epicardial
patch electrodes failed to produce any significant attenuation artifac
ts suggestive of infarction.