APPLICATION OF A TAXON PRIORITY SYSTEM FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING BY SELECTING AREAS WHICH ARE MOST DISTINCT FROM ENVIRONMENTS ALREADY RESERVED

Citation
Jcz. Woinarski et al., APPLICATION OF A TAXON PRIORITY SYSTEM FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING BY SELECTING AREAS WHICH ARE MOST DISTINCT FROM ENVIRONMENTS ALREADY RESERVED, Biological Conservation, 76(2), 1996, pp. 147-159
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00063207
Volume
76
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
147 - 159
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-3207(1996)76:2<147:AOATPS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Measures of phylogenetic diversity have been used to establish conserv ation priorities amongst groups of taxa. We adapt one such measure ('P hylogenetic Diversity' or 'PD') to a hierarchical environmental classi fication and use its algorithm to design a conservation reserve system (using the Northern Territory of Australia as a case study). This app roach accords priority selection to sites which are most dissimilar to the environments already secured in the existing conservation network , and hence rapidly increased equitability in reservation percentage a t higher levels of the hierarchy (broad environmental groups). Variati on within these broad classes (i.e. environmental classes defined at a lower level of the hierarchy) is included in selections, but this inc lusion tends to occur later in the selection process. This approach re sults in an eventual complete solution (to the goal of 5% reservation of all recognised environmental classes), which is 18% more expensive than a minimum-set solution which treats all environmental classes as equally distinct, but its advantage of rapid securement of main-enviro nments would be compelling where only a limited number (less than the minimum set) of additions to the existing conservation network is achi evable in the forseeable future. The approach is further contrasted wi th a prioritisation mechanism ('irreplaceability') associated with min imum-set approaches. Irreplaceability is largely a measure of limited distribution, and we argue that this may not be an important ranking c riterion if the limited environment is defined at a low classification level and closely related environments are already well-represented i n the existing conservation network. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Scien ce Limited.