BUSULFAN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND FRACTIONATED TOTAL-BODY IRRADIATION FOR AUTOLOGOUS OR SYNGENEIC MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE AND CHRONICMYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA - PHASE-I DOSE-ESCALATION OF BUSULFAN BASED ON TARGETED PLASMA-LEVELS
T. Demirer et al., BUSULFAN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND FRACTIONATED TOTAL-BODY IRRADIATION FOR AUTOLOGOUS OR SYNGENEIC MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE AND CHRONICMYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA - PHASE-I DOSE-ESCALATION OF BUSULFAN BASED ON TARGETED PLASMA-LEVELS, Bone marrow transplantation, 17(4), 1996, pp. 491-495
In a previous phase I study, it was concluded that tolerable doses of
busulfan (BU), cyclophosphamide (CY) and total body irradiation (TBI)
were 8 mg/kg, 60 mg/kg and 12.0 Gy, respectively, for autologous marro
w transplant recipients, In an attempt to decrease the variability of
BU steady-state concentration (Css) following oral dosing, a BU dose e
scalation study based on targeted plasma levels was performed in patie
nts receiving autologous transplants for AML or syngeneic transplants
for CML, In this study, the BU dose was adjusted up or down based on o
bserved plasma concentration, All patients received a fixed dose of CY
60 mg/kg and TBI of 12 Gy, The first dose level evaluated was 8.6 mg/
kg with a target BU Css of 511 ng/ml, Eight patients were entered at t
his level and the median BU Css achieved was 441 (range 253-566), One
of eight patients developed grade 3-4 regimen-related toxicities (RRT)
, The oral dose of BU for dose level II was 10.6 mg/kg with a target C
ss of 632 ng/ml, Six patients were entered at this level and median BU
Css achieved was 642 (range 566-674), One of six patients developed g
rade 3-4 RRT, The oral dose for dose level III was 12.6 mg/kg with a t
arget BU Css of 754 ng/ml, Five patients with AML were entered at this
dose level and the median plasma BU Css was 733 ng/ml (682-900). Two
of five (40%) patients at dose level III developed grade 3-4 RRT which
was considered excessive making dose level II the MTD, This study sho
wed that targeted BU Css can reliably be achieved with a bias of -5.23
% and mean absolute error of 11.3%, Overall, targeting made a -32.5% t
o 158.3% change in plasma BU Css as compared to expected BU Css based
on first dose pharmacokinetics if targeting were not performed in this
study, Thus, targeting avoided much of the variability in BU Css seen
in other studies and appears to have allowed for an increase in oral
dosing from 8 mg/kg to 10.6 mg/kg, Despite achieving higher and more u
niform BU Css, there was no apparent effect on relapse or survival, al
though the number of patients evaluated was small.