Ga. Neyhart et al., SOLVENT-INDUCED ELECTRON-TRANSFER AND DELOCALIZATION IN MIXED-VALENCECOMPLEXES - ELECTROCHEMISTRY, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(15), 1996, pp. 3724-3729
For the Ru-III/II couple in [(bpy)(2)ClOs(4,4'-bpy)Ru (NH3)(5)](3+) (b
py = 2,2'-bipyridine; 4,4'-bpy = 4,4'bipyridine), E(1/2) varies linear
ly with the donor number (DN) of the solvent with a slope of -26 +/- 3
mV/DN unit ranging from nitromethane to dimethylsulfoxide. For the Os
-III/II couple, the variation is -3 +/- 1 mV/DN unit. Plots of Delta E
(1/2) = E(1/2)(2) - E(1/2)(1) VS DN (E(1/2) is the half wave potential
for the first or second wave by cyclic voltammetry) undergo a change
in slope at DN similar to 14 where there is a change in oxidation stat
es in the mixed-valence form from Os-III-Ru-II to Os-II-Ru-III By extr
apolation of these data, Delta G degrees for the mixed-valence equilib
rium, [(bpy)(2)ClOsIII-(4,4'-bpy)Ru-II(NH3)(5)](4+) reversible arrow [
(bpy)(2)ClOSII(4,4'-bpy)RU(III)(NH3)(5)](4+), varies from +5.8 kcal/mo
l in nitromethane to -7.5 kcal/mol in dimethyl sulfoxide. It differs f
rom Delta E(1/2) by up to similar to 20% even though it has sometimes
been assumed in the literature that Delta E(1/2) = -Delta G degrees. F
or [(bpy)(2)ClOs(pz)Ru(NH3)(5)](3+) (pz = pyrazine) both Os-III/II and
RU(III/II) couples are significantly solvent dependent for solvents o
f DN < 24. In these solvents oxidation states in the mixed-valence for
m are Os-III-Ru-II. The slopes of E(1/2) VS DN plots are -21 +/- 4 mV/
DN unit (RU(III/II)) and -8 +/- 4 mV/DN unit (Os-III/II). At DN > 24 t
he oxidation states switch to Os-II-RU(III) and the solvent dependence
reverts to being largely in Ru-III/II There is evidence in the electr
ochemical data, in comparisons between [(bpy)(2)ClOs(pz)Ru(NH3)(5)](3) and [(bpy)(2)ClOs(4,4'-bpy)RU(NH3)(5)](3+) for significant through-b
ridge electronic coupling in [(bpy)(2)ClOsII(pz)Ru-III(NH3)(5)](4+) bu
t not in I(bpy)2ClOs''(pz)Ru'''(NH3)51''+. The difference in behavior
is caused by extensive H-bonding to the solvent at -RU(III)(NH3)(5)](3
+) in [(bpy)(2)ClOsII(pz)Ru-III(NH3)(5)](4+) This mixes solvent charac
ter into d pi(Ru-III) which decreases electronic coupling across the b
ridge.